Against the hysteria prevalent in today's media, in which immigrants are often painted as a drain on the public coffers, inherently unassimilable, or an outright threat to national security, Hondagneu-Sotelo finds the intersection between migration and religion and calls attention to quieter voices, those dedicated to securing the human dignity of newcomers. In this timely and compelling account of the contribution to immigrant rights made by religious activists in post-1965 and post-9/11 America, Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo provides a comprehensive, close-up view of how Muslim, Christian, and Jewish groups are working to counter xenophobia. Our findings suggest that views about the characteristics of certain groups of immigrants are strongly linked to national-level debates about unauthorized immigration. The strongest effects observed were income on stereotypes of Middle Eastern and Asian immigrants and concerns about the problem of unauthorized immigration on stereotypes of Latin American and Middle Eastern immigrants. Findings from regression analyses indicate little direct effect of county-level percent foreign born or media consumption. ResultsRespondents generally rated Asian immigrants most positively and Latin American immigrants most negatively, with European and Middle Eastern immigrants occupying an intermediate position. We exploit a split-ballot design in two waves of the Ohio Poll to test hypotheses about effects of contextual and respondent-level characteristics on immigrant stereotypes. immigrants from Latin America, the Middle East, Europe, and Asia. This study explores variation in stereotypes of U.S. Further complicating the story is the ways in which religion has been intertwined with race and ethnicity. Currently there are religious groups involved in anti-immigration politics and in efforts to protect immigrants’ rights. ![]() But such tolerance has not been uniform, and anti-immigrant politics again emerged. One result was an expansion of religious diversity as never before, and a significant expansion of American tolerance. In 1965, new immigration laws opened opportunities for immigrants from Asia and Latin America. By 1924, laws severely restricting immigration, especially immigrants who were from countries that were predominantly Catholic (e.g., southern and eastern Europe), or who were Jewish (e.g., from Poland/Russian), or were from non-Christian societies (e.g., China, Japan). The nation's Protestant majority reacted with suspicion to the arrival of large numbers of Catholics, then Jews, in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. ![]() Religion and the politics of immigration in the United States have a complicated history.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |